Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Subaru Forester 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 195 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 48 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.3 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Forester can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1557 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`494 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |