Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 195 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 45 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`494 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |