Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 202 HP | |
Torque: | 307 NM | 318 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.2 | |
Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |