Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 229 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 19 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |