Jeep Cherokee 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 58 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 12.5 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 45 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`087 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |