Jeep Cherokee 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 58 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 12.5 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 45 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`087 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |