Jeep Cherokee 1996 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 31 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 21 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.74 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | 1080 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 674 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 874 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`087 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |