Jeep Cherokee 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 313 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 13.7 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1999 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 47 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |