Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Jeep Cherokee torque is 1 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.6 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2015 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2015 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 2078 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 523 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`495 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`793 kg | 1`619 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 702 kg | 511 kg | |
| Jeep Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |