Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery Sport, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 167 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 167 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 448 litres | 963 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1651 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Discovery Sport has more luggage space (by 515 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery Sport (by 96 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`495 kg | 2`550 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`793 kg | 1`904 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 702 kg | 646 kg | |
| Jeep Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |