Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Subaru Forester 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 238 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 5 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.2 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 2155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 1707 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`291 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |