Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Cherokee) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 60 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 266 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`291 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |