Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 124 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2015 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`110 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |