Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 80 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 157 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |