Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Cherokee) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes GLC) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 100 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes GLC 2015 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Mercedes GLC has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`500 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mercedes GLC scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |