Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.1 - 4.0 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 185 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 296 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 22.3 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 14.2 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.88 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 47 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`771 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |