Jeep Cherokee 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Cherokee
1996 - 2001
Mitsubishi Pajero
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jeep Cherokee is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.5 - 4.02.8 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 116 - 192 HP125 - 208 HP
Torque: 198 - 305 NM292 - 313 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 - 13 seconds11.3 - 19.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.5 - 14.012.4 - 14.3
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.71 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.63 m1.90 m
Jeep Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Cherokee is 46 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1011 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2033 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`169~ 3`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 36002400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv