Jeep Cherokee 1996 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 192 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 305 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.0 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 37 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1011 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2033 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Jeep Cherokee has 892 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`169 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |