Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.7 | 3.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 211 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 - 360 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 14.6 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`368 | ~ 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |