Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.7 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 211 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
Torque: | 224 - 360 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 14.6 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is 17 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 527 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 952 litres | |
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 382 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 999 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`368 | ~ 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |