Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Grand Vitara can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Suzuki Grand Vitara also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.7 | 1.9 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 211 HP | 129 - 229 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 - 360 NM | 183 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 14.6 | 7.7 - 11.3 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 691 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1951 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`368 kg | ~ 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`797 kg | ~ 1`561 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 571 kg | ~ 509 kg | |
| Jeep Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |