Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.7 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 211 HP | 106 - 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 - 400 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 14.6 | 6.8 - 9.7 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 758 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`784 | ~ 2`057 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |