Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs BMW X3 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.7 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 211 HP | 150 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 - 400 NM | 200 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 7.4 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 14.6 | 7.2 - 12.0 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Cherokee is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`784 | ~ 2`292 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
BMW X3 has
| |