Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Jeep Commander 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Cherokee is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jeep Commander is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Commander can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.7 | 3.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 205 HP | 213 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 460 NM | 319 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.5 seconds | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.7 | 10.8 - 15.5 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Commander. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 30 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 666 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`527 | ~ 3`186 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |