Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 271 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.0 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 83 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`388 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |