Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Cherokee
2013 - 2018
Jeep Cherokee
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee 2008 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee 2013 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.22.8 - 3.7

Performance

Power: 140 - 271 HP177 - 205 HP
Torque: 229 - 350 NM314 - 460 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 12 seconds10.3 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 10.08.6 - 11.7
Jeep Cherokee 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee 2008. On average, Jeep Cherokee 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee 2008.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.49 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.67 m1.74 m
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is larger, but lower.
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee 2008, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 412 litres878 litres
Jeep Cherokee 2008 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee 2013 has 466 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee 2008. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee 2008, which means Jeep Cherokee 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`388~ 2`527
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 13 6007400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Jeep Cherokee has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv