Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 271 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.0 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 138 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`388 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |