Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Compass 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 271 HP | 136 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12 seconds | 10.6 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.0 | 6.0 - 9.0 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Compass. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 46 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`388 | ~ 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |