Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 271 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.0 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Cherokee is 10 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 456 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`388 | ~ 2`213 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |