Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Subaru Forester 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 271 HP | 150 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 400 NM | 196 - 238 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 - 8.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1401 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 896 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`223 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |