Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Subaru Forester 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jeep Cherokee is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 271 HP | 150 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 450 NM | 196 - 238 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 9.1 seconds | 9.9 - 10.3 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Cherokee are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Subaru Forester. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 10.7 | 7.2 - 8.2 | |
|
Jeep Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee and Subaru Forester are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 57 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.8 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`427 kg | ~ 2`223 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |