Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 271 HP | 150 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 400 NM | 340 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.6 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 - 8.1 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1401 litres | 591 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 810 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`362 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 40 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |