Jeep Cherokee 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 271 HP | 150 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 450 NM | 260 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 9.1 seconds | 6.4 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 10.7 | 1.9 - 8.1 | |
|
On average, Jeep Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 - 201 mm (5.9 - 7.9 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 448 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1555 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`427 kg | ~ 2`492 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`750 kg | ~ 1`900 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 677 kg | ~ 592 kg | |
| Jeep Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |