Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 4 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Lantra is 10 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai Lantra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Lantra, so Hyundai Lantra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |