Hyundai Lantra 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 13 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai Lantra is 10 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai Lantra has 157 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Hyundai Lantra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai Lantra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Lantra, so Hyundai Lantra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |