Hyundai Lantra 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Hyundai Lantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Lantra has 29 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |