Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Seat Toledo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 42 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |