Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`775 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |