Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 18 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |