Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 39 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Lantra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Used also on Mitsubishi Colt | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is larger. Hyundai Lantra is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |