Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Volvo V50 2006
Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 129 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.2 | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S40, Volvo C30 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
Hyundai Lantra is smaller. Hyundai Lantra is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |