Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 129 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 67 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.5 | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 145, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Alfa Romeo 156 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Lantra, so Alfa Romeo 156 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |