Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Rover 400 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 129 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 15 HP less power than Rover 400, but torque is 2 NM more than Rover 400. Despite less power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.8 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Rover 400 has
| |