Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Hyundai Lantra engine produces 27 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |