Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 139 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 8 NM less than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1421 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |