Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 139 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 24 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Coupe | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
Hyundai Lantra is smaller. Hyundai Lantra is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1677 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`840 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |