Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 34 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |