Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 42 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.3 | |
| Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is smaller. Hyundai Lantra is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1677 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |