Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Used also on Volvo S40 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |