Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Ford Focus 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Focus, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Lantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Focus, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Ford Focus has
| |