Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Audi A4 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 13 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Used also on Volkswagen Passat | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Lantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Audi A4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1270 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Audi A4 has
| |