Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Citroen Berlingo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 6 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, but torque is 2 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Lantra could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Lantra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Berlingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Berlingo 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.80 m | |
| Hyundai Lantra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 40 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Berlingo, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |